Search This Blog

Thursday, February 23, 2012

I Think I Might Be Wee-weed Up

I’m sitting in the Salt Lake City Airport, surrounded by Mormon assault troops in white shirts and ties, and I’m about to do something I never thought I would do (no, I’m not converting...one wife is enough). I’m about to agree with and quote Sarah Palin. From FOX News no less.

Her brilliant and insightful comments were in response to attacks on Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum, after the Drudge Report published a message he gave in a church during the 2008 presidential campaign. Here is an excerpt from that message:

"This is a spiritual war. And the Father of Lies has his sights on what you would think the Father of Lies would have his sights on: a good, decent, powerful, influential country - the United States of America. If you were Satan, who would you attack in this day and age?"


"Satan is attacking the great institutions of America, using those great vices of pride, vanity, and sensuality as the root to attack all of the strong plants that has so deeply rooted in the American tradition. He attacks all of us and he attacks all of our institutions."

Now if you are one of the Christians that make up roughly 82% of the U.S. population, you probably have little trouble with that statement. Even if you are just one of those folk who believe in Satan, even if you don’t believe in God (I know that doesn’t make much sense, but they are out there), then you probably have blamed Satan for the economy, terrorism and reality television.

But if you are in the mainstream media, Santorum’s statement…in a church, no less…make him a wild-eyed radical threat to all that make our nation great. And in the blogosphere, comments like the following abound:

From cqtestk4xs...Ooooh, do you believe in the great big bad Satan. He has his sights set on America. Does this sound a bit like some wild eyed fanatical religious jihadist Moslem to anyone besides me? The only thing is, it's some wild eyed religious Christian zealots who would like to be president. Scary, isn't it?

So why am I suddenly in agreement with Palin? No, this is not an endorsement for Santorum, Palin or FOX News. That said, I have to agree with Palin’s comments, even if I find her use of the English language a bit disturbing. So here we go...

"They will attack any conservatives who boldly proclaims their faith and talks about there is good in the world and there's evil in the world and that's what Rick Santorum was talking about," explained Palin. "And this was a speech that he gave back in 2008, where he named evil as Satan. And for these lame-stream media characters to get all wee-weed up about that, first you have to ask yourself, 'Have they ever attended a Sunday school class even? Have they never heard of this terminology before?" And that's why they got so, you know, just whacked out about the speech."

So there you have it...lame-stream media strikes again, and I’m wee-weed up. But I see a restroom sign just down the concourse, so I think I’m ok.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Then They Came For The Jews

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out —
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists,
and I did not speak out —
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.


Then they came for the Jews, and I did
not speak out — Because I was not a Jew.


Then they came for me — and there was
no one left to speak for me.


- German pastor Martin Niemoeller, reflecting on the Nazi terror


In a conversation the other day with a fellow pastor, the talk turned to the Obama Administration's refusal to grant religious organizations an exemption from purchasing health insurance that covers abortion-inducing drugs, surgical sterilization, and contraception. My companion's comment put this egregious and dangerous violation of religious liberty totally into perspective.

"Good for the Catholics! It's about time they get what they deserve for supporting such a liberal administration."

Since I've never discovered a polite way of telling someone they are dumber than a sack of turnips, I excused myself and went to the restroom. When I returned my friend was on his cell phone, and my urge to strangle him had passed.

Are we, who profess the evangelical Christian faith really so naive (the polite word for "dumber than a sack of turnips) as to believe that the president's recent decision only infringes on the Catholic Church's freedom of religion, and we are all somehow still safe? Is our Catholic bias so strong...and with it our apparent ignorance of our reformational origins...that it is somehow OK when discrimination happens to "them?"

At a time when New York City schools have given Christian churches until this weekend to find another place to meet, because while "religious services" are still permitted on school property, Christian "worship services" are now prohibited. (And yes, the Supreme Court has already refused to overturn this decision.)

At a time when the United States Air Force has removed the word "God" from their Rapid Capabilities logo. The previous moto read "Opus Dei Cum Pecunia Alienum Efficemus" (Doing God's Work with Other People's Money). It's now changed to "Miraculi Cum Pecunia Alienum Efficemus" (Doing Miracles with Other People's Money).

At a time when the Supreme Court has ruled that the will of the people of California regarding Proposition 8 (a ban against same-sex marriage) is unconstitutional...

At times like this, can we really ignore ANY shot fired at ANY portion of the Christian community? Why am I hearing talking heads on major Christian television networks making statements like "Well, we'll just have to see how the Catholic Church fares under these new rulings."

We evangelicals must follow the lead of men like Chuck Colson and stand unequivocally with our Roman Catholic brothers and sisters. Because when the government violates the religious liberty of one group, it threatens the religious liberty of all. We should be writing and calling our representatives and senators. Our voices should be heard along with those of Catholic bishops and university presidents.

Because if this bone-headed ruling is allowed to stand, what (or who) comes next? Tax exemptions? Clergy housing allowances? Requirements for ALL clergy to perform same-sex marriages or face fines (if you don't think that can happen, talk to some of our brothers and sisters in Canada).

Then they came for the Catholics, and I did
not speak out — Because I was not a Catholic.